Tom Gilson

Parents Take Note: “We Want Diverse Books”

Parents, take note. Agents, publishers, and their customers at schools and libraries are looking for “more diverse books.”

There is a “shift in thinking” among agents for children’s book writers, says Julie Masis in the February 2016 Writer’s Digest. Agents are seeing a demand for “stories with diverse and LGBTQ main characters'” “more LGBT YA [Young Adult]. Esp. if you have a trans protagonist.” “Would love LGBT YA realistic sports fiction for ‘tween boys with gritty, raw, and honest depiction of LGBT athletes today.”

Not just agents but editors are looking for LGBT materials for young adults. The reason given is disturbing. The Writer’s Digest article quotes literary agent Annie Bomke, “I think these books are not so much to be informative, but to give children who might be leaning in that direction a sense that this is normal, they’re not alone. Also, it’s good for [heterosexual kids ] to see a diverse range of people so that they can recognize it as not them, but still normal and OK.”

She goes on to say that if two stories were otherwise equivalent, publishers would be more likely to accept the one with LGBT characters. Another agent, Brent Taylor, suggests that the boom in LGBT YA books reflects schools’ and libraries’ “conscious effort to purchase them.”

Not discussed in this article: whether ‘tween boys are interested in reading “gritty, raw, and honest” stories of LGBT athletes. A few years back when Phillip Pullman’s virulently anti-Christian (especially anti-Catholic) Golden Compass trilogy was making waves—and even being offered as curriculum by Scholastic—our local librarian told me not to give it much thought. Libraries were buying the books but kids weren’t reading them. I could see why: I read the trilogy and found the plot to be poorly constructed, the characters oddly uninteresting.

Maybe some of the new LGBT YA books are more interesting. What is undeniably of interest is the intentional effort to normalize homosexuality and transgenderism for “children who might be leaning in that direction.” This contradicts typical LGBT rhetoric. Gays and lesbians commonly declare that their sexuality was never their choice. Based on my own conversations with gay men, I have no reason to doubt that is true — for those men, that is. Whether the same is true for all is hard to say: the research so far is inconclusive for multiple reasons, including pro-LGBT bias.

The material under discussion here, however, is for children who admittedly are making a choice. They’re leaning. They’re wondering. They haven’t discovered that they’re same sex-attracted regardless of choice; they’re making decisions about it.

Maybe they’ve had a furtive experience or two with peers. Maybe they enjoyed some aspects of it. Maybe they’re wondering what that might mean. I’m pretty sure that kind of thing was going on among students when I was in school. The majority of them, I’m also quite sure, wrote it off as nothing but a guilty and odd experience. With repeated experiments of that sort being discouraged by the saner morality of the day, most of them moved on to realize they were made for intimacy with the opposite sex.

I don’t have numbers: I don’t know how many youth of my day had experiences fitting this description. It matters little here. The point is that some of those students might have been described as “leaning.” Many of them probably leaned back again: they chose heterosexuality for their future experiences. The point of the current publishing trend is to push them over the rest of the way. They call it being “supportive.”

Gay activists want to have it both ways, it seems: their sexuality was never a matter of choice for them, but they sure want to be there to help young people decide to be like them.

What Needs Supporting

There really is a certain kind of support that gay, lesbian and gender-questioning students need. They get bullied, taunted, and shunned. That’s wrong, and they need support from other students to put an end to it. (They’re not the only ones.) Christian students should be the first to stand up for any classmate who is being mistreated. They should indeed support the full humanity of their LGBT classmates, though without endorsing all their choices.

Sound complicated? It needn’t be as hard as it sounds, though it takes some thought and effort. That’s part of the reason I wrote my forthcoming book, Critical Conversations: A Christian Parents’ Guide To Discussing Homosexuality With Teens.

But that’s not the kind of support today’s publishing industry is focused on. As Bomke says, it “isn’t just about the market” — or as I would interject, whether or not boys want those books about gay athletes after all — “it’s about reaching readers and making a positive difference.”

Positive? No. It misplaces badly the kind of support LGBT and questioning students need most. Difference? Definitely.

Parents, take note.

Commenting Restored

The comment function here has been out of service, possibly causing frustration, for which I apologize. You can comment again now, and it will save and post as it should do. First-time commenters' comments will not appear, however, until approved in moderation.

3 thoughts on “Parents Take Note: “We Want Diverse Books”

  1. There is one thing missing in most blogs – they are worldly and forget this is just the first world that humans will live. We have another life after this death. We have a soul which will go on to live somewhere else – that somewhere, we will be choosing as we live our life here. If we live within the boundaries of what God has given us, we will be choosing heaven. I believe we MUST pass on God’s message to all we come in contact with to be doing His work and gaining merits for a heaven. We must talk to God often to get His help in this life. He answers too!!! It might not be what you would like to hear but He knows what is right for us. Only God knows what’s beyond the horizon – let Him have control!
    So here I am going to say, read Moses. Many keep the commandments in their lives and religious ceremonies but forget He gave Moses the plans for an altar, gold, bronze, linens, priests and vestments!!! Then the lamb! He told to slay eat and eat it!
    When Christ came He took the place of the lamb and said bread and wine was His body and blood and to eat them.
    Not too many people know all this today and live in a demon led life -because no one taught them- not even parents!!! We need prayers -talking to God and asking that they learn somehow what He wants them to know to choose heaven for their next life. And when we have the opportunity -we must teach all our families and those we meet everyday those things that will bring their choice to heaven. We have a huge duty to do this. Never forget it. We can’t wait for our fellow humans to come to us. We must watch when God sends one our way—which I hope I am doing at this moment!!!

  2. There is very little biblical reference to homosexuality. Jesus never spoke about it or against it while was here in our presence.
    The old testament mentions it being an abomination but take into account the hundreds of mosaic laws that modern Christians & Jews have decided against honoring due to the fact that times have changed…
    There were same gender oriented people back in the day just as there are now. And it has never been a choice to be hetero/homosexual. Perhaps bisexuality presents a decision making situation. But love & attraction of the same gender only can not be argued against. It is what it is.
    To promote such behaviors as normal can not persuade a heterosexual person to change sides. Sexual orientation is much to personal and is quite serious for most people.
    The fact is that God created homosexual/transgender people and he loves them…

  3. Andrea, thank you for visiting.

    Your points here are unfortunately not fully well informed. I’ve covered most of them here on my blog, and all of them in my forthcoming book.

    Jesus didn’t speak out against rape, incest, or Internet piracy. He did speak clearly about marriage being for a man and woman “from the beginning,” meaning in its original intent in the mind of God.

    The Old Testament’s laws fall into multiple categories, and there are rational, logical, non-ad hoc reasons to consider some of them to be binding today while others are not. The reasons stem mostly from different contexts in which different commands are delivered.

    The fact that we understand and apply different things differently, given that they are indeed different and are delivered in different contexts, is a good thing, not a bad thing. It is a mark of rationality to treat different things differently. Before you criticize Christians for doing that you would do well to understand the reasons.

    “It is what it is,” you say. There are difficult choices sometimes, based on what is. I recognize that. God’s loving standard is what it is, too.

Comments are closed.


Subscribe here to receive updates and a free Too Good To Be False preview chapter!

"Engaging… exhilarating.… This might be the most surprising and refreshing book you’ll read this year!" — Lee Strobel

"Too Good To Be False is almost too good to be true!" — Josh McDowell

Purchase Here!

More on the book...

Discussion Policy

By commenting here you agree to abide by this site's discussion policy. Comments support Markdown language for your convenience. Each new commenter's first comment goes into moderation temporarily before appearing on the site. Comments close automatically after 120 days.

Copyright, Permissions, Marketing

Some books reviewed on this blog are attached to my account with Amazon’s affiliate marketing program, and I receive a small percentage of revenue from those sales.

All content copyright © Thomas Gilson as of date of posting except as attributed to other sources. Permissions information here.

Privacy Policy