Tom Gilson

The Truth Holds Us (Short Version)

Thinking Christian
Thinking Christian
The Truth Holds Us (Short Version)
/

Are Christians arrogant when we say we know the truth?

I’ve finally been able to make a good recording of The Truth Holds Us. I enjoyed some great hospitality at Williamsburg Christian Academy this morning, and shared this message with their high-school group.

At 21 minutes and a half minutes, this is about two-thirds to one-half the length of the full version of this talk. I cut it most in the historical/philosophical portion. My apologies for the quick and light treatment I gave it there, but it was necessary—you’ll even hear the class bell ring near the end.

Series Navigation (Arrogant Christianity?):<<< The Truth Holds Us (Reposted)The Essential Missing Prologue To All Apologetics >>>
Commenting Restored

The comment function here has been out of service, possibly causing frustration, for which I apologize. You can comment again now, and it will save and post as it should do. First-time commenters' comments will not appear, however, until approved in moderation.

2 thoughts on “The Truth Holds Us (Short Version)

  1. Tom,

    I enjoyed your talk, however, I am wondering how accurately relativism describes the modern or post modern mindset. Yes for sure there is the appearance of relativism and people who talk a relativist talk, but it seems to me when a relativist demands, for reasons of politeness or any thing else, that I also accept relativism he has assumed a self refuting position. The claim that there is no truth is, after all, itself a truth claim– a kind of “uber truth“. It becomes especially so when you explicitly or implicitly demand that I comply to a certain way of thinking. A “true” relativist, in my opinion, would keep his beliefs to himself

    I think a deeper problem here is what I call arbitrary absolutes that suddenly appear with this kind of mindset. I can guarantee you that the very same people who advocate there is no truth or no absolutes (‘let’s all be tolerant’) also advocate things like abortion rights, gay rights and animal rights. Did you ever notice how uncompromising and absolutistic they are in defending these kind of rights? Did you ever notice how they treat people who disagree with them? Did you ever notice how demagogic their rhetoric becomes?

    Clearly these were not rights 50-60 years ago. What makes them rights now? A fact a certain group of people have arbitrarily decided that they are now rights? In my opinion beyond the façade of “polite” relativism is an intolerant authoritarian mindset that is grounded in a set of “absolutes” that are completely arbitrary.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe

Subscribe here to receive updates and a free Too Good To Be False preview chapter!

"Engaging… exhilarating.… This might be the most surprising and refreshing book you’ll read this year!" — Lee Strobel

"Too Good To Be False is almost too good to be true!" — Josh McDowell

Purchase Here!

More on the book...

Discussion Policy

By commenting here you agree to abide by this site's discussion policy. Comments support Markdown language for your convenience. Each new commenter's first comment goes into moderation temporarily before appearing on the site. Comments close automatically after 120 days.

Copyright, Permissions, Marketing

Some books reviewed on this blog are attached to my account with Amazon’s affiliate marketing program, and I receive a small percentage of revenue from those sales.

All content copyright © Thomas Gilson as of date of posting except as attributed to other sources. Permissions information here.

Privacy Policy

Clicky