Some of you have been watching the exchange between Dr. Steven Novella and Dr. Michael Egnor on neuroscience and mind. The most recent installments are here (Dr. Egnor’s), responding to this from Dr. Novella. Dr. Egnor writes in summary to his post,
I’ll get back to Dr. Novella’s specific arguments in my ensuing posts, but Dr. Novella’s invocation of “neuroscience denialism” leaves me dumbfounded.
He’s right. Dr. Novella is playing rhetorical games. This time it’s almost pathetically transparent. Why, oh why do anti-ID people not engage the real argument?