This talk on Views of Truth was given on March 9 to the Chapel at Kingsmill. I regret that I had no control over the recording method–the microphone was far from the front of the room, so there’s room noise. It’s still audible and listen-able in spite of that, though.
Thinking Christian
Discussion Policy
By commenting here you agree to abide by this site's discussion policy. Comments support Markdown language for your convenience. Each new commenter's first comment goes into moderation temporarily before appearing on the site. Comments close automatically after 120 days.
Copyright, Permissions, Marketing
Some books reviewed on this blog are attached to my account with Amazon’s affiliate marketing program, and I receive a small percentage of revenue from those sales.
All content copyright © Thomas Gilson as of date of posting except as attributed to other sources. Permissions information here.
The Thinking Christian blog is back, using a temporary design following an extended maintenance break. Some design features are missing, included images on posts. We're working on it as time allows. Further improvements to come!
Subscribe
Subscribe here to receive updates and a free Too Good To Be False preview chapter!
Discussion Policy
By commenting here you agree to abide by this site's discussion policy. Comments support Markdown language for your convenience. Each new commenter's first comment goes into moderation temporarily before appearing on the site. Comments close automatically after 120 days.
Copyright, Permissions, Marketing
Some books reviewed on this blog are attached to my account with Amazon’s affiliate marketing program, and I receive a small percentage of revenue from those sales.
All content copyright © Thomas Gilson as of date of posting except as attributed to other sources. Permissions information here.
Hi Tom,
Thanks for sharing this; it is a really good talk.
You mentioned scientism and postmodernism and I was reminded again in our latest discussion with Paul that although the two are seen as opposite or contradictory views, I view them as soul-mates. The scientismist believes that nothing can be known without scientific verification. The postmodernist agrees, but realizes that because all of science’s findings are tentative and subject to change then, through science, we don’t really know anything; but since there is no other vehicle to knowledge the scientismist is committed to post-modernism is committed to not knowing anything.
Tom,
Just FYI.. I think this post is destroying the formatting of your page in Firefox.
Thanks for the heads-up, doctor(logic)! I’ll have to get my resident code technician (my son) on the problem later tonight.