Posts Tagged ‘Music’

The Authentic Musician: Book Review

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

Book Review

authenticmusician.jpg

As a freshman music major at Michigan State University I played trombone in the Spartan Marching Band and in the Symphonic Band. A sophomore named John Haddix played trumpet in the same two bands. He lived down the hall from me in Mary Mayo Hall, a dorm that attracted a lot music majors, especially men—for us it was the nearest housing to the music buildings, where most of us spent at least half our waking hours. John’s roommate at the time was a grad assistant named Dana who helped run the Marching Band program, among other responsibilities. He lived in the dorm as a grad student for two reasons: proximity to the music department, and the chance to connect with and mentor younger students.

Which is what both he and John did with me—spiritually, that is. They were both followers of Christ, and I was not. I had given up on Christianity, in fact, having tried it and found it unsatisfying or even impossible to live. John and Dana showed me it was possible to be an authentic Christian and to enjoy life in Christ. They also helped me understand its message was true. And so it was that on a Sunday evening in January 1975, in their dorm room, I committed my life to Christ.

That began a lifelong friendship especially with John. We roomed together the next two and a half years in college. We stood up in each other’s weddings. He lives near Indianapolis now, while I live in southeast Virginia, but we still keep in touch. One thing I know about John Haddix from all these years of friendship: if he speaks about what it means to be an authentic musician, he does so with credibility and authority.

And that’s exactly what he’s done, with the publication last week of The Authentic Musician: Discovering Your Purpose As An Artist. Why would a book like this be significant? Well, have you ever spent time around musicians? We (I still do some music, though less than before) are a strange lot: on the one hand devoted to the highest of arts (in my humble opinion), and yet often subject to the pettiest ways of living life. We can be extremely competitive—no, make that cutthroat. Often we think we’re special. If we’re successful, then lots of other people tell us we’re special, too, and of course we love to hear it. And we know we’re different from non-artists, ordinary people, the hoi polloi. We make the most of that difference, so we can feel even more special. One chapter of The Authentic Musician is titled “Sanity.” If you know musicians you know why that’s relevant.

I’m not speaking of every musician. Some, like John, know what it means to cultivate an authentic heart, one that gives God his place of pre-eminence, that recognizes the high value of art but does not over-magnify it, that understands that like every other endeavor, art is to be an expression of love and service not for oneself but for others.

The Authentic Musician speaks its best and most important message when speaking of the heart. Matters of skill and excellence are not overlooked; to be an authentic musician, after all, one must be a musician. But what John shares about “Discovering and Guarding Your Heart” is well-spoken and highly significant:

The amount of energy it takes to create a large work is incredible…. Sometimes it takes great vigilance to keep your work from becoming an unhealthy compulsion.

Very true. It applies to writing too.

Displaying one’s art requires vulnerability. It often takes great courage for an artist to share her work with even the most non-condemning audience, let alone other artists and critics! And if an artists is seeking to find her significance through others’ affirmation or applause, she is set up for fear, disappointment, disillusionment, and hurt.

I have seen the most talented of soloists break down in tears over feeling inadequate. The cure for that isn’t becoming an even better artist. That’s an ever-receding goal, a false hope and a false promise. The solution lies in becoming a more whole person, a more authentic artist. John has a lot to share on that.

Also valuable is the chapter, “Me? Impact People Through Music?” John evaluates various perspectives on music’s purpose, especially whether it’s appropriate to think of using it to persuade. He distinguishes most helpfully between persuasion and manipulation. Now with the mission/arts group Artists in Christian Testimony, John previously served many years with Keynote, the music (and more) ministry of Campus Crusade for Christ. I may be biased on this, since I too was a part of Keynote for ten years, yet I believe no other music ministry understands how to communicate a coherent message the way they do. That special competence comes through in this chapter of John’s book.

Speaking of bias, there’s no use pretending I’m free of prior opinion regarding this book or its author. There are places where I as a writer would have liked an opportunity to tweak some words and sentences. Still I’m certain this book would have been extremely helpful during my college years and beyond, when I was dealing with the competitiveness, the temptation to fake being something I wasn’t, sometimes even the challenge to my sanity. Thankfully its author was there and knew something even then to help me along. I heartily recommend The Authentic Musician to any musician. The book is for real, and can help you be authentic, too.

The Authentic Musician: Discovering Your Purpose As An Artist by John Haddix. Westfield, IL: Earthwhile Publishing, 2010. In print or downloadable from Lulu.com.

The Pleasure of Doing What’s Good For You

Saturday, August 23rd, 2008

TromboneI was a trombone major as an undergrad, with an emphasis on classical music. We trombonists owe a lot to Beethoven: he was the first major composer to include trombones in “secular” music. You see, when Martin Luther translated the “last trumpet” (the signal for Christ’s return) in his German Bible, he called it instead the “last trombone” (die letzte Posaune). For many years composers considered the trombone too noble to use in non-sacred music. (There’s a marvelous letze Posaune trombone solo in Mozart’s Requiem.) Beethoven broke free of that beginning in his famous Fifth Symphony.

There’s a great lesson for us here on not drawing too sharp a distinction between the sacred and the secular, but I have other thoughts on my mind today. Not only do I appreciate what Beethoven did for my instrument, I have always really loved his music. He deserves his reputation for greatness: there’s a masculine vitality in his compositions, coupled with an intense spiritual richness, such as few have ever matched. Still, being a brass player, most of the music I’ve listened to in my life has been of the full-orchestra, let-er-rip-with-the-trumpets-and-trombones sort. (Or of the let-er-rip-with-guitars sort, but that’s another story.)

BeethovenThey told me in college I would really enjoy Beethoven’s string quartets. “It’s pure music,” they said. “You should listen to them. It would be good for you.” But I thought, “how many trombones are there in a string quartet?” and I passed them by. The other day at the library, though, I picked up a CD of Beethoven’s first Razumovski quartet. It took only a moment for me to realize “they” were right. It’s pure music, and though it has no brass, it’s just as full of that same vitality and richness I’ve always appreciated in Beethoven’s larger works. It’s great music.

Sometimes when they tell you “it’s good for you,” they’re right.

I’m not saying you have to enjoy Beethoven. It’s a learned taste. But what I am saying is something not too distant from that. Here’s another example to help make my point. 200808201328.jpgThe first Dickens novel I ever tried to read was Oliver Twist. I couldn’t get past the second chapter: the language was just too strange for me. Years later, though, something led me to read A Tale of Two Cities. I think it was just because everybody said Dickens was good, and I thought I’d give him a second chance. “I should read it; it’ll be good for me,” was in the back of my mind. It took me all of a couple pages to forget I was reading a “classic.” It’s just a great, great story, very well told.

The string quartet and A Tale of Two Cities both proved to be good for me in very unexpected ways: I liked them. There’s a reason they’re classics. It’s because they’re good. There’s a reason they’re considered good: it’s because people through the years have consistently liked them. Sure, there are great moral and literary lessons to be learned from Dickens, Shakespeare, Milton, and so on., but their first virtue is that they’re enjoyable to read. (That doesn’t mean I’m going to try Oliver Twist again, though. Well, maybe someday.)

Sometimes when they tell you “it’s good for you,” they’re right.

A year or so ago I started swimming laps two to three times a week. I felt great the first time I made 400 yards, half of it elementary backstroke, which is swimmer language for “taking a nap on your back while moving slowly through the water.” Now I’m up to 1000 to 1200 yards per session, three days a week when I’m not traveling, and loving it. My speed is just slightly better than that of Olympic distance swimmers… divided by 4, that is. I’m not quick, but I’m a lot stronger than I was. The doc says it’s good for me, and it turns out he was right.

What God says in the Bible is “good for you” turns out to be right, too. Take sexual morality, for example. My wife and I both saved ourselves for marriage in that respect, and the payoff in terms of mutual trust has been huge. When I travel out of town, and we tell each other, “you can trust me,” we know it’s true, because we were tested in it for a long time before we got married.

I’m trying to learn the same lesson in other aspects of my life. I know “it’s good for me” to resist donuts and chocolate cake, and as long as I can’t see them, smell them, think about them, or stop in at the store to pick some up, I’m fairly immune to both. Otherwise I have trouble. I know it’s good for me not to mess around unproductively with tweaking this blog’s features, or looking at blog statistics, but I still waste far too much time on these things. There are plenty of other changes, too personal to write here, that would also be good for me. I’m still learning.

But I’m starting to catch on. Not always, but at least fairly often, there’s a reason people say “it’s good for you.” It’s because it’s good.