The Evolutionists’ Complaint: It’s Wrong to Argue For ID By Arguing Against Evolution (Part 1 of 3)

This entry is part 1 of 3 in the series The Evolutionist's Complaint

Last week I posted an article in which I attempted to show that evidence against evolution can legitimately be evidence in favor of Intelligent Design. I ran into some serious opposition on that, and even though my interlocutors’ objections there were often mis-aimed, they did lead me to think through the matter more deeply. I …

January 29, 2010 – 2:05 pm | By Tom Gilson | Posted in Origins and Science | Tagged , | Comments Off

The Evolutionists’ Complaint: It’s Wrong to Argue For ID By Arguing Against Evolution (Part 2 of 3)

This entry is part 2 of 3 in the series The Evolutionist's Complaint

This is the second stage of an argument responding to what I have called The Complaint: that Intelligent Design’s (ID’s) negative argumentation against naturalistic evolution (NE; defined here as the development of life and its complexity through undirected random variation coupled with natural selection) is somehow illegitimate, unscientific, or otherwise weak or wrong. If you …

January 29, 2010 – 2:02 pm | By Tom Gilson | Posted in Origins and Science | Tagged , | Comments (4)

The Evolutionists’ Complaint: It’s Wrong to Argue For ID By Arguing Against Evolution (Part 3 of 3)

This entry is part 3 of 3 in the series The Evolutionist's Complaint

This is the third post in a series exploring The Complaint of evolutionists: that Intelligent Design’s (ID’s) negative argumentation against naturalistic evolution (NE; defined here as the development of life and its complexity through undirected random variation coupled with natural selection) is somehow illegitimate, unscientific, or otherwise weak or wrong. (This is not the place …

January 29, 2010 – 2:00 pm | By Tom Gilson | Posted in Origins and Science | Tagged , | Comments (76)