Integrating ID and Biblical ThinkingIntelligent Design is not necessarily a
theologically-related topic, except that, for those of us who believe in Jesus
Christ, every topic is related in some way or other to God and to Biblical
thinking. Thomas Woodward, near the end of his most
recent book on ID, says that a fully integrated statement of this
relationship is still lacking or at least underdeveloped (pp. 186-187; as
explained early in the book, he uses "Darwinism" as shorthand for the
neo-Darwinian
synthesis):
"It is clear that religious issues are in play in this grand debate, but this is true just as much on the Darwin side as it is on ID's side. Many scholars working in the ID community have pointed out a key fact: Darwinism may not entail atheism, but it appears certain that to some extent, atheism entails Darwinism. Thus to question Darwinism on scientific grounds, to an atheist, cuts deep into the beliefs and presuppositions embedded in their own worldview. This is a dynamic fact of the ID-Darwinism debate that is often overlooked. It is clear also that ID theorists need to do a better job of explaining the interface between the question, 'Is there real design in nature?' and the logical next question, 'Who or what is the designer?'... Clearly, those interested in ID do have deep interest in knowing the answer to the question: are there principled ways to proceed out of the bare design inference into investigating the nature and identity of the design-agent that will honor empirical evidence, logic, and respect for pluralistic rational discourse?" It's not that this has never been addressed, but that questions keep arising and need to be answered. My last post took another stab at this, but it admittedly remains unconnected to other aspects of the overall question. I'm trying to gather a list of the major questions, with a view to pulling many or all of them together under one framework. Here's my list so far. What would you
add?
• Did ID arise out of a strictly religious
agenda, or does it have genuine empirical roots?
• How does ID relate to Scientific
Creationism?
• Is ID is a watered-down (disguised) version
of Creationism?
• Is ID a disguised attempt to sneak religion
into American public schools and other places where it's legally, socially, or
politically unwelcome?
• Does referring to a Designer as an
explanation quench scientific curiosity?
• ID makes very minimal claims about the
characteristics of the Designer. Is this a fair approach; and what should
Christians do with it?
• Is theistic evolution theologically viable?
How does it relate to ID's claims and programs?
• Does the possibility of an active,
intervening God conflict with laws and regularities of
science?
• Is ID about a "God of the
Gaps"?
• Is ID a misguided attempt to demonstrate or
prove the reality of God?
• What about Scientific Creationists' views
of ID, and does ID's typical old-earth view conflict with
Genesis?
• What are the religious entailments of
Darwinism?
• What are the biological/scientific
entailments of Philosophical
Naturalism?
That's my list so far. I think I've written about all of these; and if I haven't, dozens of others certainly have, so the information is out there. Is there a place on the web to find this all addressed integratively? William Dembski has written this; I don't know of others. Are there questions missing from this list? Posted: Mon - April 9, 2007 at 03:14 PM | |
Quick Links
Categories
"Do Christians believe we hold the truth? No, it holds us; we submit to it and to the One who gives it. We seek the truth to know it and follow it, that it may grip us tighter yet." Personal Profile
Guest Speaking Articles Published Elsewhere Frequently Discussed Topics My Other Blog Email this link to a friend XML/RSS Feed: Blog Entries Feedburner Feed XML/RSS Feed: Comments Archives
Knowing God
Recent Comments
Blogroll
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category: Published On: Dec 06, 2007 01:04 PM |