Thinking Christian

Could this be? Looks like John Rennie, who until recently was the long-time Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American, thinks it’s a good idea to teach the controversy!

The roughly 60 percent in the mushy middle steered around conflicts between evolution and creationism or taught both and let students draw their own conclusions. (Always such a good idea….)

[From Teachers Fail Evolution Education: Scientific American Podcast]

Print Friendly

_______________

Possibly related posts (automatically generated):

1. Evolution in Public Schools: Threatiness and the Genetic Fallacy
2. “What Is Pseudoscience?: Scientific American”
3. “A Healthy Debate”
4. “Moon Not Made of Cheese, Physicist Explains”
5. “AlbertMohler.com – The End is Near? The False Teaching of Harold Camping”