“Turning Back the Cellular Clock: A Farewell to Embryonic Stem Cells?: Scientific American”

Good news on one front of the culture wars:

A Farewell to Embryonic Stem Cells?

[Link: Turning Back the Cellular Clock: A Farewell to Embryonic Stem Cells?: Scientific American]

_______________

Possibly related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Do You Think Hawking Was Serious?
  2. “What Is Pseudoscience?: Scientific American”
  3. Your Brain in Love: Scientific American
  4. “Sex and stigma, with Francoise Barre-Sinoussi : Scientific American”
  5. Scientific American: “Dubitable Darwin? Why Some Smart, Nonreligious People Doubt the Theory of Evolution”
  1. jb wrote:

    It took me a while to figure out why the time display on my cell phone had anything to do with Bio-ethics. :-)

  2. Kevin Winters wrote:

    I’m genuinely curious: if an embryo is essentially human, don’t the created embryos have the same ‘right to be born’ as one that is created ‘naturally’ in the uterus? What is it that distinguishes one embryo from the other?

Comments are disabled for this post

All written content on this website, except for material attributed to other sources, is copyright © Thomas A. Gilson as of date of posting. See Further Information below concerning permissions.