IMO, Darwinism\’s influence on Hitler/Nazis is incredibly tenuous compared to Christian-Antisemitism, and I hope you address that topic as well when you write about the Nazi connection.

Darwinism\’s (purported) ties to Hitler do not change the truth of Darwinism. That\’s ad hominem.

This will be the last of my comments on this post – if you\’d like to respond, would you kindly link to a post of yours that you find more appropriate? I will gladly continue there.

Isn\’t all of that just an ad hominem argument? What if Darwinism did contribute to genocide? Does that mean it\’s suddenly a false theory?

Shouldn\’t you be banning some of your own blog posts based on your Discussion Policy?

I\’m very interested in facts, but as I said when I closed the comments, I wasn\’t interested in spending my whole weekend responding as one man to potentially dozens of people coming over from Pharyngula and PT to challenge me as you have here. That, too, is a fact. As you can see [referencing his email and an earlier portion of my reply], there are answers [factual corrections, actually] to what you wrote. But this blog is not my full-time job. It\’s a one-man side occupation, and there are limits to what one person can do.

There are still limits. I have deadlines today on two projects that are completely unrelated to all this. I\’m going to try to keep comments open if possible.
From the beginning, this blog\’s comment policies have limited discussion to what is germane to the post. This post is about the Expelled conference call, it\’s about Ben Stein\’s motivation for handling it as he did, and it\’s about Myers\’s interruption. It is not about whether ID is science or religion, it is not about whether ID is creationism, it\’s not about whether it should be taught in public schools, and it\’s not even about whether Expelled is going to be great or a fraud. There are places to debate all that, and in fact we have done it often (and at great length) on this blog. This post is about the conference call. Comments that attempt to open up other topics or that violate other discussion policies will be deleted in their entirety, at my discretion, without further explanation. Discussion will remain open as long as that works. If I should decide to close comments later in the day, it will be because I have run into a limit in what I can monitor here while also doing my other work.
In other words, if later today I close comments, it will not be because of what I\’m afraid of. It\’s because if there are errors of fact, or if there are challenges presented that could be answered, I take responsibility to answer rather than to leave those things hanging out there with no response. I\’ll risk the ridicule of being called afraid rather than leave such comments without a proper answer.
If you explore older posts in this blog, you\’ll see that there is a whole lot of discussion going on between theists and atheists. I welcome that kind of debate and disagreement as long as it\’s on topic and civil.
So if I do close comments later today, I\’ll ask you in advance to recognize there\’s a real person here with a real life, to avoid the temptation to stereotype, and to represent what I actually say rather than assume something else is going on, with nothing but your own prior perceptions (prejudices) regarding ID proponents as evidence.