<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P.Z. Myers Crashes &#8220;Expelled&#8221; Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/</link>
	<description>Do Christians &#34;hold the truth?&#34; No, the Truth holds us...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gilson </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gilson </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>How did Myers get his invitation? An email correspondent reveals:

&lt;a href=\&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php#comment-80894\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;This comment&lt;/a&gt; was recently posted on Pharyngula by Kristine, who I believe is PZ\&#039;s grad student (but I could be wrong about that...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did Myers get his invitation? An email correspondent reveals:</p>
<p><a href=\"http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php#comment-80894\" rel=\"nofollow\">This comment</a> was recently posted on Pharyngula by Kristine, who I believe is PZ\&#8217;s grad student (but I could be wrong about that&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lippard </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lippard </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2516</guid>
		<description>Tom:  It\&#039;s too bad you deleted Norman Doering\&#039;s link to his blog post.  It\&#039;s actually a quite interesting post about how the Nazis actually banned writings promoting Darwinism, and how it was creationist Edward Blyth\&#039;s ideas that led to eugenics.  Norman also points out multiple passages from Hitler\&#039;s _Mein Kampf_ which look more like something written by a creationist than an evolutionist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom:  It\&#8217;s too bad you deleted Norman Doering\&#8217;s link to his blog post.  It\&#8217;s actually a quite interesting post about how the Nazis actually banned writings promoting Darwinism, and how it was creationist Edward Blyth\&#8217;s ideas that led to eugenics.  Norman also points out multiple passages from Hitler\&#8217;s _Mein Kampf_ which look more like something written by a creationist than an evolutionist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Trask </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2515</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Trask </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2515</guid>
		<description>How about deleting your ridiculous insult to Darwin?  That would be a good ad hominem to start with...

Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about deleting your ridiculous insult to Darwin?  That would be a good ad hominem to start with&#8230;</p>
<p>Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2514</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2514</guid>
		<description>Give me a break. Myers did not \&quot;crash\&quot; the screening of Expelled, and it was NOT invitation only. Just writing that on your blog does not make it true. Your arguments must have a basis in reality, they must have supporting evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break. Myers did not \&#8221;crash\&#8221; the screening of Expelled, and it was NOT invitation only. Just writing that on your blog does not make it true. Your arguments must have a basis in reality, they must have supporting evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Trask </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Trask </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>And, Tom: have you even read The Origin of Species?  I\&#039;ll bet you have not.

Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, Tom: have you even read The Origin of Species?  I\&#8217;ll bet you have not.</p>
<p>Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Waldrop </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Waldrop </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>Tom, Myers has addressed the false claim that this was an \&quot;invitation only\&quot; screening and that he was not invited. He registered and received a confirmation to attend beforehand. It\&#039;s the film\&#039;s producers who have a problem with the facts.
As for oversimplifying the argument, I think the poster of Ben Stein spray-painting \&quot;Darwin\&quot; on a Nazi belt-buckle speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, Myers has addressed the false claim that this was an \&#8221;invitation only\&#8221; screening and that he was not invited. He registered and received a confirmation to attend beforehand. It\&#8217;s the film\&#8217;s producers who have a problem with the facts.<br />
As for oversimplifying the argument, I think the poster of Ben Stein spray-painting \&#8221;Darwin\&#8221; on a Nazi belt-buckle speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Trask </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Trask </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>...and, of course, because if you\&#039;re going to take a position that flies in the face of reason, you need to think about how to frame that position before you dive in.  You really ought to save yourself the trouble and just admit that you said a dumb, dumb thing.  

Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and, of course, because if you\&#8217;re going to take a position that flies in the face of reason, you need to think about how to frame that position before you dive in.  You really ought to save yourself the trouble and just admit that you said a dumb, dumb thing.  </p>
<p>Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>Tom, the \&quot;necessary condition(s)\&quot; for the Holocaust were a long history of antisemitism, an atmosphere of nationalistic fear, and a psychotic ruler willing to misuse ANY idea to fit his insane program.

If you look at the modern genocides in parts of Africa or if you read the Old Testament descriptions  of genocides (Numbers 31 comes to mind), you\&#039;ll see that evolution is in no way a necessary condition for us to be really nasty to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, the \&#8221;necessary condition(s)\&#8221; for the Holocaust were a long history of antisemitism, an atmosphere of nationalistic fear, and a psychotic ruler willing to misuse ANY idea to fit his insane program.</p>
<p>If you look at the modern genocides in parts of Africa or if you read the Old Testament descriptions  of genocides (<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Numbers+31" class="bibleref" title="ESV Numbers 31">Numbers 31</a> comes to mind), you\&#8217;ll see that evolution is in no way a necessary condition for us to be really nasty to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Trask </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Trask </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>Oh, for gosh sakes...\&quot;Darwinism\&quot; a necessary condition to the holocaust...do you know how asinine that sounds?  Do you listen to yourself?  Do you have any idea at all what you are saying?  

So, genocide and anti-semitism--two things which have existed for thousands of years--these two things could not have come together were it not for a British naturalist arriving at the view that speciation is caused by the natural selection of adaptive variations.  Suuuuuure.  That makes sense.  How could anyone have been so blind as not to see that before?  Until Darwin, anti-semites could NEVER have put two and two together and figured out, \&quot;hey, we could use GENOCIDE to get rid of the Jews!  Thanks, Mr. Darwin!  If I didn\&#039;t know all this stuff about pigeon breeding from reading The Origin of Species, I would never have thought of that!\&quot;  

Cripes.  Study history, biology, and above all, LOGIC before you say something that silly.  

Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, for gosh sakes&#8230;\&#8221;Darwinism\&#8221; a necessary condition to the holocaust&#8230;do you know how asinine that sounds?  Do you listen to yourself?  Do you have any idea at all what you are saying?  </p>
<p>So, genocide and anti-semitism&#8211;two things which have existed for thousands of years&#8211;these two things could not have come together were it not for a British naturalist arriving at the view that speciation is caused by the natural selection of adaptive variations.  Suuuuuure.  That makes sense.  How could anyone have been so blind as not to see that before?  Until Darwin, anti-semites could NEVER have put two and two together and figured out, \&#8221;hey, we could use GENOCIDE to get rid of the Jews!  Thanks, Mr. Darwin!  If I didn\&#8217;t know all this stuff about pigeon breeding from reading The Origin of Species, I would never have thought of that!\&#8221;  </p>
<p>Cripes.  Study history, biology, and above all, LOGIC before you say something that silly.  </p>
<p>Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>Tom: do you also maintain that Darwinism was a necessary condition for the Pogrom of 1096, the massacres of Jews in London and York in 1189-1190, the massacres in 1348, the massacres of Jews and Roman Catholics by the Cossacks in 1648–1654, and the anti-Jewish riots in Odessa in 1821?  If not, then what made the Holocaust different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: do you also maintain that Darwinism was a necessary condition for the Pogrom of 1096, the massacres of Jews in London and York in 1189-1190, the massacres in 1348, the massacres of Jews and Roman Catholics by the Cossacks in 1648–1654, and the anti-Jewish riots in Odessa in 1821?  If not, then what made the Holocaust different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Doering </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2507</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Doering </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2507</guid>
		<description>Tom Gilson wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The connection between Darwinism and the Holocaust is not a lie when it is understood the way thoughtful people have presented it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Feel free to present that \&quot;thoughtful way\&quot; here:
http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/04/if-hitler-was-darwinist.html
http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/04/if-hitler-was-atheist.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Gilson wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>The connection between Darwinism and the Holocaust is not a lie when it is understood the way thoughtful people have presented it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Feel free to present that \&#8221;thoughtful way\&#8221; here:<br />
<a href="http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/04/if-hitler-was-darwinist.html" rel="nofollow">http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/04/if-hitler-was-darwinist.html</a><br />
<a href="http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/04/if-hitler-was-atheist.html" rel="nofollow">http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/04/if-hitler-was-atheist.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam mclane </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>adam mclane </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2506</guid>
		<description> We will be adding some to the discussion as well. We sat in on the same phone call. 

http://ymexchange.com/blog/2008/03/28/ben-steins-expelled-documentary-media-call-hacked-by-pz-meyers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will be adding some to the discussion as well. We sat in on the same phone call. </p>
<p><a href="http://ymexchange.com/blog/2008/03/28/ben-steins-expelled-documentary-media-call-hacked-by-pz-meyers/" rel="nofollow">http://ymexchange.com/blog/2008/03/28/ben-steins-expelled-documentary-media-call-hacked-by-pz-meyers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>PZ Myers did, in fact, join the Expelled conference call. And, apparently, he did accuse Stein, et al., of lying. Being a scientist, it sounds like he even provided evidence to back up the assertion. Perhaps the makers of Expelled will release a transcript of the call. I\&#039;d rather not simply take someone\&#039;s word for what was said...

This post makes the claim that PZ Myers wasn\&#039;t invited to the MI screening of Expelled. I went to the Expelled website, and it is an open invitation just as PZ claims. Perhaps Mr. Gilson should look at the their website before parroting that particular line. In what way is an open invitation NOT an invitation? That\&#039;s simply a bizarre claim.

Secondly, there have been several substantive articles and blog posts by both PZ Myers, Richard Dawkins, and other about the actual content of the movie. I would refer Mr. Gilson &lt;a href=\&quot;http://expelledexposed.com/\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt; ExpelledExposed.com&lt;/a&gt; for a list of some of these articles and blog posts. Keep checking back! they\&#039;ll be adding more.

If you want to know how PZ got voice capabilities, read his blog post on the incident. It\&#039;s hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PZ Myers did, in fact, join the Expelled conference call. And, apparently, he did accuse Stein, et al., of lying. Being a scientist, it sounds like he even provided evidence to back up the assertion. Perhaps the makers of Expelled will release a transcript of the call. I\&#8217;d rather not simply take someone\&#8217;s word for what was said&#8230;</p>
<p>This post makes the claim that PZ Myers wasn\&#8217;t invited to the MI screening of Expelled. I went to the Expelled website, and it is an open invitation just as PZ claims. Perhaps Mr. Gilson should look at the their website before parroting that particular line. In what way is an open invitation NOT an invitation? That\&#8217;s simply a bizarre claim.</p>
<p>Secondly, there have been several substantive articles and blog posts by both PZ Myers, Richard Dawkins, and other about the actual content of the movie. I would refer Mr. Gilson <a href=\"http://expelledexposed.com/\" rel=\"nofollow\"> ExpelledExposed.com</a> for a list of some of these articles and blog posts. Keep checking back! they\&#8217;ll be adding more.</p>
<p>If you want to know how PZ got voice capabilities, read his blog post on the incident. It\&#8217;s hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Waldrop </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2504</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Waldrop </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2504</guid>
		<description>Ian, you\&#039;re being too kind in talking about \&quot;the claim made in this post...\&quot; This post in fact simply repeats one of many lies made by the producers of the film. Among Mark Mathis, Ben Stein, and the other individuals promoting the idea that Darwinism was responsible for the Holocaust, there really is no intelligence allowed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, you\&#8217;re being too kind in talking about \&#8221;the claim made in this post&#8230;\&#8221; This post in fact simply repeats one of many lies made by the producers of the film. Among Mark Mathis, Ben Stein, and the other individuals promoting the idea that Darwinism was responsible for the Holocaust, there really is no intelligence allowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>Will: Myers describes exactly what he did in his own blog post on the incident (already linked to above, but &lt;a href=\&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php\&quot; rel=\&quot;nofollow\&quot;&gt;here it is again for good measure&lt;/a&gt;.  He also refutes there the claim made in this post that the attacks on &lt;i&gt;Expelled&lt;/i&gt; haven\&#039;t addressed the substance of the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will: Myers describes exactly what he did in his own blog post on the incident (already linked to above, but <a href=\"http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php\" rel=\"nofollow\">here it is again for good measure</a>.  He also refutes there the claim made in this post that the attacks on <i>Expelled</i> haven\&#8217;t addressed the substance of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>Tom,
I appreciate a good controversy, but is there any thing convincing out there to link the real PZ with the person breaking in on the call? If there isn\&#039;t then I side with the skeptics even though I personally have a low opinion of PZ\&#039;s character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
I appreciate a good controversy, but is there any thing convincing out there to link the real PZ with the person breaking in on the call? If there isn\&#8217;t then I side with the skeptics even though I personally have a low opinion of PZ\&#8217;s character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will TS </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2502</link>
		<dc:creator>Will TS </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2502</guid>
		<description>How does one break in on a conference call?  Did you participate in the conference call?  Was the phone call taped?  Do you have a transcript? Is there any actual evidence that Myers interrupted Stein\&#039;s conversation?  Or do we have to accept it as a matter of faith?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does one break in on a conference call?  Did you participate in the conference call?  Was the phone call taped?  Do you have a transcript? Is there any actual evidence that Myers interrupted Stein\&#8217;s conversation?  Or do we have to accept it as a matter of faith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>There have been many substantive criticisms of the movie. There has been criticism of its specious argument that evolutionary theory was a precondition to the Holocaust (despite genocidal impulses clearly predating Darwin, which should have made that bit of stupid a non-starter without even having to study evolution), its failing to explain the scientific method or detail the scientific merits of neo-Creationism (I mean why would that be important in determining why neo-Creationism doesn\&#039;t have a seat at the table?), its erroneous portrayal of persecution by interviewees, and its nebulous invocation of \&quot;free speech.\&quot; You just aren\&#039;t looking. The matter of them excluding PZ Myers was simply comedic hypocrisy.

Further if you really think that Dawkins is gentler to religion than PZ Myers, then I suggest it\&#039;s because you haven\&#039;t listened to him speak or read his latest book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been many substantive criticisms of the movie. There has been criticism of its specious argument that evolutionary theory was a precondition to the Holocaust (despite genocidal impulses clearly predating Darwin, which should have made that bit of stupid a non-starter without even having to study evolution), its failing to explain the scientific method or detail the scientific merits of neo-Creationism (I mean why would that be important in determining why neo-Creationism doesn\&#8217;t have a seat at the table?), its erroneous portrayal of persecution by interviewees, and its nebulous invocation of \&#8221;free speech.\&#8221; You just aren\&#8217;t looking. The matter of them excluding PZ Myers was simply comedic hypocrisy.</p>
<p>Further if you really think that Dawkins is gentler to religion than PZ Myers, then I suggest it\&#8217;s because you haven\&#8217;t listened to him speak or read his latest book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Doering </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Doering </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2500</guid>
		<description>He did it:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He did it:<br />
<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Doering </title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingchristian.net/2008/03/this-is-going-to-raise-another-ruckus/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Doering </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingchristian.net/?p=1310#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>I just commented on PZ\&#039;s blog asking if he did that.

By the way, here\&#039;s some stuff on Ben Stein:
http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2008/03/ben-stein-admits-he-has-only-little-pea.html
http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2008/02/ben-stein-crouching-theocon-hidden-nit.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just commented on PZ\&#8217;s blog asking if he did that.</p>
<p>By the way, here\&#8217;s some stuff on Ben Stein:<br />
<a href="http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2008/03/ben-stein-admits-he-has-only-little-pea.html" rel="nofollow">http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2008/03/ben-stein-admits-he-has-only-little-pea.html</a><br />
<a href="http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2008/02/ben-stein-crouching-theocon-hidden-nit.html" rel="nofollow">http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2008/02/ben-stein-crouching-theocon-hidden-nit.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
